Tucker, R and Abbasi, N (2015) The architecture of teamwork: Examining relationships between teaching, assessment, student learning and satisfaction with creative design outcomes. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 11(6), pp. 405-422. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
Student satisfaction with teamwork experiences is important for two interrelated reasons. First, students learn about teamwork more effectively when they view their teamwork learning experience more positively. Second, their satisfaction with prior teamwork learning has an impact on future teamwork learning – because team effectiveness is influenced by attitudes and motivations to teamwork shaped by past experience. This paper draws on data collected from almost 196 students at 4 Australian universities. It considers the relationships between architecture students' satisfaction with two dimensions of teamwork – its processes and its outcomes – and five pedagogic factors that teachers can control: team size, assessment, team formation, the teaching of teamwork skills and knowledge, and feedback on teamwork skills and processes. The results indicated that a student's perception of whether assessment was fair was the greatest predictor of satisfaction. Through an understanding of the factors that contribute to positive learning experiences for students in teams, suggestions are given on how design educators might better support student learning in teamwork assignments and student learning of how to design in teams.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | assessment; design; learning; pedagogy; teaching; teamwork |
| Index terms: | dimension, learning experience, team effectiveness, student satisfaction, pedagogy, motivation, satisfaction, teamwork |
| Subjects: | professions and roles, management, teaching methods, psychology, health monitoring assessment and metrics, project delivery, learning methods |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Education, Human Resources, Health and Safety, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here