Vaz-Serra, P; Edwards, P and Aranda-Mena, G (2022) An early-stage project complexity assessment tool for the AEC industry. Construction Innovation, 22(2), pp. 242-262. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose: Complex projects require careful management. They may expose stakeholders to greater risks and place additional demands upon resources. In the initial stages of project development, however, little may be known about the nature and magnitude of such complexity. This paper aims to ensure that this gap is at least subjectively assessed and addressed. Design/methodology/approach: Research, using focus group workshops with a convenience sample of construction professionals, was carried out to test the validity of a Project Early Stage Complexity Assessment Tool (PESCAT). The PESCAT concept brings together selected complexity theories and uses subjectively based measures for assessment. Findings: The findings confirm that an early-stage project complexity assessment tool is practicable and can contribute to project management practice in the construction industry. It should be applied by individual project stakeholders using small teams of experienced staff. PESCAT explores project complexity through “filter” sets of perspective factors which should be customised to reflect the stakeholder’s role and processes in a project. Originality/value: In the initial complexity assessment model, resolution space and uncertainty were tested as project complexity parameters. However, in subsequent versions of the tool, four measures (differentiation and differentiation uncertainty; interdependency and interdependency uncertainty) are used in an innovative way that focuses users' attention more clearly and points to a more targeted approach for addressing project complexity. The value of our model lies in its practical application and the project management benefits it can deliver.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | assessment; construction management; innovation; project complexity; project management; risk management |
| Index terms: | project development, complex project, resolution, construction industry, project management, construction professional, risk management, validity, workshop, differentiation, project complexity, complexity, methodology, project stakeholder, project management practice, focus group |
| Subjects: | project delivery, strategic project management, risk assessment, construction type, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, organization, conflict resolution, sociology, industry analysis, systems engineering, research methods, organizational theory, project management theory and practice, professional development |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Project Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Construction Technology, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here