Wuni, I Y; Shen, G Q; Ogungbile, A J and Ayitey, J Z (2022) Four-pronged decision support framework for implementing industrialized construction projects. Construction Innovation, 22(2), pp. 263-283. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose: Industrialized construction (IC) is promoted to address some of the ills associated with the processes and products of the traditional construction approach. With several successful projects, IC is progressively becoming a preferred alternative construction approach and spurred the interest of contractors, developers and housing authorities in the technology. Increasingly, these stakeholders are keen to ascertain the compatibility and feasibility of using IC in their projects. This paper aims to develop a knowledge-based decision support framework for implementing industrialized construction projects (ICPs) that can facilitate better and informed decision-making when deciding to implement ICPs. Design/methodology/approach: A comprehensive literature review was implemented to recruit 40 decision support factors (DSFs) and grouped into project requirements, location and site attribute, labour considerations and organizational factors. A 3-member expert panel validated the relevance of 35 DSFs, which became candidates for a structured questionnaire survey of experts in 18 countries. Statistical techniques are used to evaluate and prioritize the DSFs, leading to the development of a conceptual framework. Findings: Statistical analysis revealed 33 significant DSFs. The top five most significant factors that could influence the decision to implement IC in a project include a stringent requirement for project quality control, suitability of the design for IC, organizational readiness and competencies in ICPs, client receptivity to IC and the need to minimize field construction time. A framework of project requirements, location and site attributes, labour considerations and organizational factors was proposed as decision support. Practical implications: The proposed framework may help to inform decision-making regarding the implementation of IC in a project. It has wider applicability because it includes technical, managerial and operational aspects of and the required competencies for IC, which are shared between project types and territories. The prioritized DSFs could be used as a guide when implementing IC, especially in countries where bespoke decision support systems cannot be developed. Originality/value: The paper delineated the most important DSFs that are shared between IC project types and territories and can be used to investigate the compatibility of using IC in a proposed project. This research constitutes the first exclusive attempt at delineating, quantifying and ranking the sets of decision-making factors, drawing on international data set and contributes to the empirical checklist of DSFs for ICPs.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | decision support factors; decision support framework; decision-making; four-pronged; industrialized construction; industrialized solutions; suitability |
| Index terms: | industrialized solution, suitability, conceptual framework, industrialized construction, housing, methodology, decision-making, questionnaire, drawing, literature review, survey, decision support, implementation, quality control, required competency, construction time, statistical analysis, organizational factor, traditional construction, becoming |
| Subjects: | theoretical framing, research methods, professional development, project controls, decision analysis, design criteria, heritage and conservation, philosophical process, construction type, data collection methods, business, technical documentation, data analysis and analytics, contractual arrangements, data science, innovation and technology management, project delivery |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Time Control, Design Practice, Quality Management, Risk Management, Construction Technology, Procurement, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here