Wheeler, A and Malekzadeh, M (2015) Exploring the use of new school buildings through post-occupancy evaluation and participatory action research. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 11(6), pp. 440-456. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
This paper presents the results of the development and testing of an integrated post-occupancy evaluation (POE) approach for teachers, staff, pupils and community members using newly constructed school buildings. It focusses on three cases of UK secondary schools, demonstrating how users can be inspired to engage with the problems of school design and energy use awareness. The cases provided new insights into the engagement of school teachers, staff and young people regarding issues of sustainability, management, functional performance and comfort. The integrative approach adopted in these cases provided a more holistic understanding of these buildings' performance than could have been achieved by either observational or more traditional questionnaire-based methods. Moreover, the whole-school approach, involving children in POE, provided researchers with highly contextualised information about how a school is used, how to improve the quality of school experiences (both socially and educationally) and how the school community is contributing to the building's energy performance. These POE methods also provided unique opportunities for children to examine the social and cultural factors impeding the adoption of energy-conscious and sustainable behaviours.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | energy performance; post-occupancy; school design; sustainable lifestyles; sustainable schools |
| Index terms: | pupil, post-occupancy evaluation, secondary school, children, lifestyle, action research, energy performance, energy use, testing, school building, comfort, questionnaire |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, construction type, evaluation methods, professional practice, energy systems, sociology, educational institutions, demography, occupational health and safety management |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Construction Technology, Stakeholder Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Education, Quality Management, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here