Karadag, I; Güzelci, O Z and Alaçam, S (2023) Edu-ai: A twofold machine learning model to support classroom layout generation. Construction Innovation, 23(4), pp. 898-914. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to present a twofold machine learning (ML) model, namely, EDU-AI, and its implementation in educational buildings. The specific focus is on classroom layout design, which is investigated regarding implementation of ML in the early phases of design. Design/methodology/approach: This study introduces the framework of the EDU-AI, which adopts generative adversarial networks (GAN) architecture and Pix2Pix method. The processes of data collection, data set preparation, training, validation and evaluation for the proposed model are presented. The ML model is trained over two coupled data sets of classroom layouts extracted from a typical school project database of the Ministry of National Education of the Republic of Turkey and validated with foreign classroom boundaries. The generated classroom layouts are objectively evaluated through the structural similarity method (SSIM). Findings: The implementation of EDU-AI generates classroom layouts despite the use of a small data set. Objective evaluations show that EDU-AI can provide satisfactory outputs for given classroom boundaries regardless of shape complexity (reserved for validation and newly synthesized). Originality/value: EDU-AI specifically contributes to the automation of classroom layout generation using ML-based algorithms. EDU-AI’s two-step framework enables the generation of zoning for any given classroom boundary and furnishing for the previously generated zone. EDU-AI can also be used in the early design phase of school projects in other countries. It can be adapted to the architectural typologies involving footprint, zoning and furnishing relations.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | architectural design; artificial intelligence; classroom layout; generative adversarial networks; machine learning; plan layout generation |
| Index terms: | Turkey, database, design phase, implementation, automation, artificial intelligence, educational building, classroom, methodology, zoning, validation, machine learning, architectural design, complexity, boundaries |
| Subjects: | urban planning, property law, contractual arrangements, artificial intelligence, professional practice, construction type, data management, systems engineering, research methods, design practice, professional development, Geography, automation and robotics |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Procurement, Governance, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Design Practice, Legal Issues, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here