Larsson, R and Rudberg, M (2023) Effects of weather conditions on concrete work task productivity: a questionnaire survey. Construction Innovation, 23(2), pp. 306-321. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose: This paper aims to study the effects of different weather conditions on typical concrete work tasks' productivity. Weather is one important factor that has a negative impact on construction productivity. Knowledge about how weather affects construction works is therefore important for the construction industry, e.g. during planning and execution of construction projects. Design/methodology/approach: A questionnaire survey method is used involving means to perform pairwise comparisons of different weather factors according to the analytical hierarchical process (AHP). The survey also contains means to enable assessment of the loss in productivity for typical work tasks exposed to different weather types. The survey targets practitioners involved in Swedish concrete construction projects, and the results are compared with previous research findings. Findings: The survey covers responses from 232 practitioners with long experience of concrete construction. The pairwise comparisons reveal that practitioners rank precipitation as the most important followed by wind and temperature. The loss in productivity varies significantly (from 0 to 100%) depending on the type of work and the type of weather factor considered. The results partly confirm findings reported in previous research but also reveal a more complex relationship between weather and productivity indicating several underlying influencing factors such as type of work, type of weather (e.g. rain or snow) and the intensity of each weather factor. Originality/value: This paper presents new data about how 232 practitioners assess the effects of weather on construction productivity involving novel means to perform objective rankings such as the AHP methodology.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | concrete; construction; pairwise comparison; productivity; questionnaire survey; weather |
| Index terms: | weather, precipitation, practitioner, questionnaire, methodology, concrete construction, construction project, survey, construction industry, construction productivity, construction work, rain, productivity, influencing factor |
| Subjects: | management, research methods, production management, building construction, industry analysis, risk assessment, data collection methods, air quality, practitioner, climate science, operations management |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here