Developing a green-building design approach by selective use of systems and techniques

Ahmad, T; Thaheem, M J and Anwar, A (2016) Developing a green-building design approach by selective use of systems and techniques. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 12(1), pp. 29-50. ISSN 1745-2007

Abstract

Building sustainability is subject to rational use of green-building systems and techniques. A suitable combination of these systems and techniques is at the heart of design parameters. To achieve user comfort and health as well as environmental protection and long-term economic benefits, designers must optimize combinations of particular systems and techniques. It is imperative to have efficient design strategies for achieving optimum solutions and effectively leading the complex process of selecting system and technique combinations to be integrated in overall design. With goal to optimize design effort, this research aims to propose different methodologies to help incorporate various green-building systems and techniques in design process. Systems and techniques prioritized by relative weights may ease the design process. Hence, with a focus on semi-arid climatic conditions, interviews are conducted from researchers and building practitioners who help express design priorities. Use of these priorities through the proposed design approach in case study of a sustainable residential building validates the workability of design methodology. Consequently, a model is proposed for integration of all three sustainability dimensions as design criteria in building simulation programs, facilitating the realization of green-building design.  Building sustainability is subject to rational use of green-building systems and techniques. A suitable combination of these systems and techniques is at the heart of design parameters. To achieve user comfort and health as well as environmental protection and long-term economic benefits, designers must optimize combinations of particular systems and techniques. It is imperative to have efficient design strategies for achieving optimum solutions and effectively leading the complex process of selecting system and technique combinations to be integrated in overall design. With goal to optimize design effort, this research aims to propose different methodologies to help incorporate various green-building systems and techniques in design process. Systems and techniques prioritized by relative weights may ease the design process. Hence, with a focus on semi-arid climatic conditions, interviews are conducted from researchers and building practitioners who help express design priorities. Use of these priorities through the proposed design approach in case study of a sustainable residential building validates the workability of design methodology. Consequently, a model is proposed for integration of all three sustainability dimensions as design criteria in building simulation programs, facilitating the realization of green-building design.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: systems and techniques; design optimization; green buildings; building sustainability; design engineering; architectural engineering; sustainability
Index terms: architectural engineering, building practitioner, building sustainability, program, integration, building system, methodology, comfort, green building, dimension, building simulation, heart, design optimization, building design, residential building, interview, design strategy, workability, design process, climatic condition, environmental protection, case study, design engineering, design parameter, designer
Subjects: sustainability and energy, modelling and simulation, architectural design, health monitoring assessment and metrics, profession, construction type, data collection methods, practitioner, design methods, climate science, engineering systems, design constraints, occupational health and safety management, organizational analysis, environmental engineering, research methods, software systems, structural engineering, medical science and clinical practice, design practice, design process
Topics: Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Health and Safety
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here