Interrelations between construction ethics and innovation: A bibliometric analysis using vosviewer

Oladinrin, O T; Arif, M; Rana, M Q and Gyoh, L (2023) Interrelations between construction ethics and innovation: A bibliometric analysis using vosviewer. Construction Innovation, 23(3), pp. 505-523. ISSN 1471-4175

Abstract

Purpose: Many companies invest in innovations because of the inherent benefits, and research on innovation has increased over the year. However, the vast majority of research papers deals with purely technical matters. There seem to be growing concerns over ethical issues in adopting innovations in the construction industry. This extant review of literature aims to analyse the interrelations between the concepts of ethics and innovations in construction research to understand the advances of current scientific production and future lines of research. Design/methodology/approach: Thus, this work presents a bibliometric analysis covering articles obtained from the Web of Science Core Collection Database published between 1995 and May 2021. A sample size of 5,786 research papers relevant to the study was evaluated using VOSviewer software. Findings: The results of the analysis shed light on the evolution of the connection between the two concepts. The study highlighted Heng Li as the most productive author. The country with the most publications and citations is China. The most productive institution is the Hong Kong Polytechnic University. The results revealed a limited intellectual exchange and lack of cohesion characterising the two concepts (ethics and innovation), resulting in a situation whereby innovation-related researchers tend to follow personal trajectories in isolation from ethics-related researchers in the construction field. Originality/value: This is probably the most comprehensive scientometric analysis ever conducted to examine the theoretical relationship between ethics and innovation in construction. This study adds to the so far limited knowledge in the field and provides insights for future research. Overall, this review may spur future research on dyad investigation of ethics and innovative related themes in construction such as ethics and sustainability, ethics and sensor-based technology and ethics and innovative safety approach.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: bibliometric; construction; ethics; innovation; sustainability; vosviewer
Index terms: publication, bibliometric analysis, polytechnic, sample size, China, Hong Kong, construction industry, database, cohesion, ethics, methodology, investigation, research paper, science, evolution, sensor-based technology
Subjects: educational institutions, data management, ethical practice, research methods, specialized education, innovation and technology management, data collection methods, research design and methodology, structural engineering, research evaluation and metrics, research dissemination and communication, environmental science, Geography, industry analysis
Topics: Geographical Context, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Education, Digital Applications, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here