Diagnosing critical barriers to international construction joint ventures success in the developing country of Ghana

Tetteh, M O; Chan, A P C; Mohandes, S R and Agyemang, D Y (2023) Diagnosing critical barriers to international construction joint ventures success in the developing country of Ghana. Construction Innovation, 23(5), pp. 1151-1185. ISSN 1471-4175

Abstract

Purpose: International construction joint ventures (ICJVs) implementation is plagued with several barriers, full understanding of which is still lacking due to a lack of an in-depth exploration of them, particularly in developing countries. To fill this knowledge gap, this study aims to investigate the critical barriers to the success of ICJVs hosted in developing countries by examining the Ghanaian case. Design/methodology/approach: This study builds on a previous study that identified 37 barriers factors to ICJVs success via a systematic literature review. Through expert interviews, 34 potential barriers were identified, and a two-round survey was conducted with 84 ICJVs practitioners in Ghana. The data collected was analyzed using the combination of a multidimensional fuzzy logic method and confirmatory factor analysis. Findings: Results showed that 22 barriers were critical. The top five most critical barriers were “lack of preparedness to accept company philosophy,” “competing objectives,” “opportunistic behavior of parties,” “conflicts” and “lack of management control.” Furthermore, the results uncovered and confirmed five significant underlying components for the 22 critical barriers, namely, organizational-related, cultural-related, knowledge-related, individual-related and logistics-related barriers. Practical implications: The findings could be useful to ICJVs practitioners and policymakers in developing suitable strategies for the successful implementation of ICJVs. Further, foreign firms aiming to execute and promote ICJVs in Ghana could have prior knowledge of the critical barriers and prepare for them. Originality/value: This study empirically analyzed the individual levels of barriers criticalities in ICJVs context and from a specific-country perspective – the developing country of Ghana – rather than in the context of construction joint ventures and from a cross-country perspective in extant studies.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: barriers; developing country; infrastructure development; international construction joint venture; multicriteria decision-making methods
Index terms: decision-making, survey, foreign firm, infrastructure development, methodology, international construction, fuzzy logic, implementation, philosophy, exploration, strategy, developing country, practitioner, joint venture, interview, opportunistic behaviour, Ghana, systematic literature review, confirmatory factor analysis
Subjects: business, practitioner, management, data collection methods, research methods, philosophical studies, statistical analysis, infrastructure engineering, research evaluation and metrics, decision analysis, Geography, contractual arrangements, data science, environmental resource management, strategic management, development economics
Topics: International Construction, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Procurement, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Sustainability, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here