Thunberg, M and Fredriksson, A (2023) A model for visualizing cost shifts when introducing construction logistics setups. Construction Innovation, 23(4), pp. 757-774. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to identify how the responsibilities and costs of planning, controlling and executing the material, resource and waste flows are shifted between actors when introducing a construction logistics setup (CLS) as a product innovation in a construction project, compared to the traditional way of organizing these activities. Design/methodology/approach: This study is an analytical conceptual research study which aims to bring new insights into a problem through logical relationship building. Empirical data are gathered in two cases where CLSs are used, through observations and interviews regarding how the activities within the order-to-delivery process are performed. The results have been discussed at workshops with suppliers, installation companies, contractor firms and trade unions. Findings: The outcome of this study is a model for illustrating how costs and responsibilities are shifted in the construction project and supply chain when a CLS is introduced. The cost shift is dependent on the activity shift that accompanies the services included in the setup. Practical implications: The practical contribution of this work is twofold. First, this study provides a methodology of how to evaluate the impact of logistics services on the actors in the construction project. Second, this study shows shifts in costs and responsibilities in logistics activities with the introduction of construction logistics services. Originality/value: The theoretical contributions of the model and this study lie in the inclusion of a multi-actor perspective in total cost modelling in supply chains.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cls; supply chain costs; total cost modelling |
| Index terms: | workshop, product innovation, contractor firm, modelling, trade union, construction logistics, interview, construction project, methodology |
| Subjects: | sociology, research methods, production management, analytical methods, data collection methods, construction type, organization, construction logistics, innovation studies |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management, Business Strategy, Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Supply Chain Management, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here