Social media sensing framework for urban infrastructure management: A Philippine case study

Do, S T; Nguyen, V T and Banlasan, D (2024) Social media sensing framework for urban infrastructure management: A Philippine case study. Construction Innovation, 24(4), pp. 1117-1136. ISSN 1471-4175

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to use social media data mining to revitalize and support existing urban infrastructure monitoring strategies by extracting valuable insights from public opinion, as current strategies struggle with issues such as adaptability to changing conditions, public engagement and cost effectiveness. Design/methodology/approach: Twitter messages or “Tweets” about public infrastructure in the Philippines were gathered and analyzed to discover reoccurring concerns in public infrastructure, emerging topics in public debates and the people’s general view of infrastructure services. Findings: This study proposes a topic model for extracting dominating subjects from aggregated social media data, as well as a sentiment analysis model for determining public opinion sentiment toward various urban infrastructure components. Originality/value: The findings of this study highlight the potential of social media data mining to go beyond the limitations of traditional data collection techniques, as well as the importance of public opinion as a key driver for more user-involved infrastructure management and as an important social aspect that can be used to support planning and response strategies in routine maintenance, preservation and improvement of urban infrastructure systems.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: data mining; public opinion; social media; stakeholder management; urban infrastructure
Index terms: social media, monitoring, public engagement, case study, public infrastructure, infrastructure management, data mining, Philippines, social aspect, stakeholder management, adaptability, methodology, urban infrastructure, strategy, routine, cost-effectivenes
Subjects: technology adoption, participation process, data science, control systems, data collection methods, user focus, infrastructure and transport systems, sociology, Geography, infrastructure engineering, management, research methods, economics
Topics: Stakeholder Management, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Organizational Design, Site Management, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here