Kineber, A F; Othman, I; Oke, A E; Chileshe, N and Zayed, T (2024) Modeling the relationship between value management implementation phases, critical success factors and overall project success. Construction Innovation, 24(5), pp. 1380-1400. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to develop an overall project success (OPS) model by investigating the mediation impact of value management (VM) implementation between VM critical success factors (CSFs) and OPS as well as the moderation impact of VM CSFs between VM implementation and OPS. Design/methodology/approach: In total, 335 structured questionnaires were administered to relevant stakeholders in the study area. The research used a partial least square structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) to model the relationship among VM implementation, CSFs and OPS. Findings: The results revealed that there is an indirect positive and significant correlation among the variables. The model prediction analysis also significantly impacted with 59.9% on OPS by setting VM implementation as a mediator variable and 61% by setting VM CSFs as a moderation variable. Practical implications: This research work will serve as a guide or benchmark for decision-makers who want to use VM to improve the success of their building projects. Originality/value: This study fills the knowledge gap by identifying and emphasizing the impact of VM CSFs and activities on OPS.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | critical success factors; Egypt; partial least square; project success; structural equation modeling; value management |
| Index terms: | project success, mediator, Egypt, modelling, implementation, value management, structural equation modelling, mediation, partial least square, critical success factor, questionnaire, methodology |
| Subjects: | analytical methods, contractual arrangements, data collection methods, control systems, dispute resolution, statistical analysis, research methods, management, project management theory and practice, Geography |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Procurement, Legal Issues, Value Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here