Mahamedi, E; Wonders, M; Gerami Seresht, N; Woo, W L and Kassem, M (2024) A reinforcing transfer learning approach to predict buildings energy performance. Construction Innovation, 24(1), pp. 242-255. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to propose a novel data-driven approach for predicting energy performance of buildings that can address the scarcity of quality data, and consider the dynamic nature of building systems. Design/methodology/approach: This paper proposes a reinforcing machine learning (ML) approach based on transfer learning (TL) to address these challenges. The proposed approach dynamically incorporates the data captured by the building management systems into the model to improve its accuracy. Findings: It was shown that the proposed approach could improve the accuracy of the energy performance prediction compared to the conventional TL (non-reinforcing) approach by 19 percentage points in mean absolute percentage error. Research limitations/implications: The case study results confirm the practicality of the proposed approach and show that it outperforms the standard ML approach (with no transferred knowledge) when little data is available. Originality/value: This approach contributes to the body of knowledge by addressing the limited data availability in the building sector using TL; and accounting for the dynamics of buildings’ energy performance by the reinforcing architecture. The proposed approach is implemented in a case study project based in London, UK.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | artificial intelligence; innovation; neural networks |
| Index terms: | case study, energy performance, artificial intelligence, building system, London, dynamics, neural network, accuracy, building management system, body of knowledge, accounting, machine learning, methodology |
| Subjects: | Geography, professional development, research methods, systems engineering, engineering systems, data collection methods, mechanical systems, energy systems, knowledge management, artificial intelligence, economic analysis |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here