Edirisinghe, R; Stranieri, A and Blismas, N (2016) Information visualisation for the wicked problem of safe construction design. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 12(4), pp. 296-310. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
Prevention through Design has been identified as an effective means to enhance construction safety. However, design professionals, clients and other stakeholders often have limited experience of construction processes. Although processes and tools have been advanced to support stakeholders, very few have been adopted in practice. The complexities inherent in designing for safe construction suggest this to be a wicked problem using criteria advanced by Rittel and Weber. Approaches advanced to solve wicked problems outside construction are not applicable for solving construction design problems, largely because they require that stakeholders expend an impractical amount of time and energy to arrive at amenable solutions. Instead, an approach that utilises information visualisation addresses criteria for wicked problem resolution. The promise of information visualisation for this wicked problem has been illustrated through a case study involving façade design. An infographic was generated following structured interviews with building designers and safety experts. A workshop involving 20 designers, engineers and safety experts demonstrated that the infographic prompted participants to identify risks not previously considered and stimulated discussion about mitigation or reduction. There was unanimous agreement that the information visualisation could feasibly be adopted within the construction industry's tight time and resource constraints.Prevention through Design has been identified as an effective means to enhance construction safety. However, design professionals, clients and other stakeholders often have limited experience of construction processes. Although processes and tools have been advanced to support stakeholders, very few have been adopted in practice. The complexities inherent in designing for safe construction suggest this to be a wicked problem using criteria advanced by Rittel and Weber. Approaches advanced to solve wicked problems outside construction are not applicable for solving construction design problems, largely because they require that stakeholders expend an impractical amount of time and energy to arrive at amenable solutions. Instead, an approach that utilises information visualisation addresses criteria for wicked problem resolution. The promise of information visualisation for this wicked problem has been illustrated through a case study involving façade design. An infographic was generated following structured interviews with building designers and safety experts. A workshop involving 20 designers, engineers and safety experts demonstrated that the infographic prompted participants to identify risks not previously considered and stimulated discussion about mitigation or reduction. There was unanimous agreement that the information visualisation could feasibly be adopted within the construction industry's tight time and resource constraints.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | façade design; wicked design; design for safety; safe construction; information visualisation; design engineering; architectural engineering; safety |
| Index terms: | interview, workshop, wicked design, case study, design engineering, engineer, designer, design for safety, architectural engineering, construction process, wicked problem, resource constraint, mitigation, resolution, construction safety, prevention, construction industry, information visualization, complexity |
| Subjects: | risk assessment, construction type, profession, data collection methods, visualization, operations management, structural engineering, design practice, health safety and environment, financial risk, conflict resolution, building construction, industry analysis, systems engineering, environmental health |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Digital Applications, Site Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Health and Safety, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here