Wuni, I Y and Mazher, K M (2024) Ending the suitability quantification dilemma: Intelligent decision support system for modular integrated construction in a high-density metropolis. Construction Innovation, 24(4), pp. 1026-1047. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose: Modular integrated construction (MiC) is a modern construction method innovating and reinventing the traditional site-based construction method. As it integrates advanced manufacturing principles and requires offsite production of volumetric building components, several factors and conditions must converge to make the MiC method suitable and efficient for building projects in each context. This paper aims to present a knowledge-based decision support system (KB-DSS) for assessing a project’s suitability for the MiC method. Design/methodology/approach: The KB-DSS uses 21 significant suitability decision-making factors identified through literature review, consultation of experts and questionnaire surveys. It has a knowledge base, a DSS and a user interface. The knowledge base comprises IF-THEN production rules to compute the MiC suitability score with the efficient use of the powerful reasoning and explanation capabilities of DSS. Findings: The tool receives the inputs of a decision-maker, computes the MiC suitability score for a given project and generates recommendations based on the score. Three real-world projects in Hong Kong are used to demonstrate the applicability of the tool for solving the MiC suitability assessment problem. Originality/value: This study established the complex and competing significant conditions and factors determining the suitability of the MiC method for construction projects. It developed a unique tool combining the capabilities of expert systems and decision support system to address the complex problem of assessing the suitability of the MiC method for construction projects in a high-density metropolis.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | decision support system; decision-making factors; expert systems; modular integrated construction; suitability evaluation |
| Index terms: | quantification, Hong Kong, density, construction project, decision-making, methodology, questionnaire, expert system, suitability, building component, knowledge base, reasoning, decision support, literature review, user interface, construction method, survey |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, analytical methods, data analysis and analytics, production management, Geography, research methods, architectural elements, information systems, design criteria, human-computer interaction, cognitive psychology, building construction, measurement and scaling, decision analysis, data management |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Site Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here