The use and limitations of mathematical models in the planning and control of construction projects

Cusack, M M (1984) The use and limitations of mathematical models in the planning and control of construction projects. Construction Management and Economics, 2(3), pp. 219-224. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

The two major parameters associated with the planning and control of construction projects are time and cost. Modelling these parameters separately presents many difficult problems. The problem of optimizing the relationship between the two is even more complicated and earlier researchers have suggested a variety of models. Models are, in a sense, an attempt to initiate a systems approach to problem solving and decision making. The aim is to try to capture the major components and the interactions of a system. Having developed the model it is possible to obtain valuable insights into the behaviour of a system with possibilities of optimizing its performance. This paper considers the general problem of modelling time and cost and examines some of the conditions and limitations of the modelling process. The overall objective of this series of papers is to find not only a way in which the time cost parameters can themselves be modelled in dynamic and reasonably precise terms, but also to demonstrate the ways in which time and cost are inter-related and how the inter-relationship changes with the expansion or the diminution of the two parameters. The ability to capture and respond to the dynamic nature of the situation has been considerably enhanced by advances in computer technology, particularly in terms of the relatively low cost and interactive nature of the micro-computer.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction project; control; heuristic models; ilp; planning
Index terms: decision-making, construction project, problem solving, mathematical model, modelling, interaction, heuristic, low cost
Subjects: mathematical modelling, risk assessment, analytical methods, bidding, decision-making and reasoning, production management, decision analysis, behavioral psychology
Topics: Risk Management, Procurement, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here