Flanagan, R and Norman, G (1985) Sealed bid auctions: An application to the building industry. Construction Management and Economics, 3(2), pp. 145-161. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
This paper examines some of the theory and practice of competitive tendering in the building industry. Allocation of building contracts by means of competitive tendering is one type of sealed bid auction. Two main strands of the theory of sealed bid auctions are developed. The first strand identifies optimal mark-up given that each tender competition occurs in isolation. The second strand treats explicitly the sequential nature of tendering and resource constraints of tenderers. It emerges that the first strand is a special case of the second. A simple optimal bid price rule is identified, which indicates that bid price for any one contractor will be affected by the resources available to the contractor and general market conditions. It is shown that bid prices will be more competitive the better the information available to tenderers, the more carefully is the tender list constructed and the greater the number of firms invited to tender. It is further shown, however, that little is gained by having more than five firms on the tender list. Some empirical evidence is examined in the light of this theory and is shown to be consistent with it.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | competitive tendering; resource constraints; sealed bid auction |
| Index terms: | building contract, building industry, competitive tendering, mark-up, market condition, competition, resource constraint, evidence |
| Subjects: | market analysis, price determination, industry analysis, tendering, operations management, contract type, evaluation and assessment methods, economic and policy analysis |
| Topics: | Procurement, Project Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here