Gray, C and Little, J (1985) A systematic approach to the selection of an appropriate crane for a construction site. Construction Management and Economics, 3(2), pp. 121-144. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Research into the consequential cost implications of design decisions (Gray, 1983) has highlighted the central role that the primary lifting device (predominantly cranes) has on the control and pace of construction operations. In attempting to evaluate cost effective design options the design team must, therefore, appreciate the full effect of the crane choice inherent in each design option. The expertise and knowledge of the criteria used to select the most appropriate cranage is held by a few experienced people either in specialist crane hirers or in contractors' plant operations. This paper describes one way in which this expert knowledge can be made available during the early design process to enable the designer to incorporate the construction implications in his thinking. However, the subject is complex since there are many thousands of cranes available in the world market place. Nevertheless the process and criteria for selection are definable and the paper describes them. The description has been incorporated in a computer-based expert system.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | computing; construction management; cranes; estimating; expert systems |
| Index terms: | design team, construction site, design process, estimating, design decision, expert system, lifting, computing, construction operation, designer, option |
| Subjects: | financial and cost management, construction operations, professional practice, work location, design methods, computing systems, profession, decision analysis, data management, occupational health and safety management, design practice |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Health and Safety, Cost Management, Site Management, Digital Applications, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here