White, A (1985) The critical path method and construction contracts: A polemic. Construction Management and Economics, 3(1), pp. 15-24. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
The Critical Path Method, in common with other planning tools seeks to simulate technologically related events and activities. One of the assumptions of the Critical Path Method states that there will be unlimited resources available enabling every task to commence at its earliest possible starting time. This rarely happens in practice. For some time, heuristic algorithms have been available for the resolution of resourcing conflicts. At the construction site level, critical path schedules are often generated from a known resource availability which dictates the network logic. The networks so produced are different from networks which model the technological relationships and then make adjustments for resource constraints. It was hoped that a resource- based network would be more rational than an activity-based network. However, there is no guarantee that the resource-based network will provide the most efficient solution. Developments in the combinatorial mathematics of scheduling enable the degree of inefficiency to be measured. At the construction site level, these issues tend to be irrelevant, however, if the Critical Path Method is being used to justify or disprove a construction claim, then distortions can be introduced.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | combinatorial mathematics; construction claims; construction delay; critical path method; prolongation costs |
| Index terms: | construction delay, resolution, guarantee, resource constraint, scheduling, critical path method, construction site, critical path, construction contract, heuristic, construction claim, distortion |
| Subjects: | contract structure, work location, contract type, project controls, risk assessment, networking, operations research, payment, operations management, conflict resolution |
| Topics: | Procurement, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Contract Administration, Risk Management, Site Management, Time Control, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here