Bresnen, M J; Ford, J R; Bryman, A E; Keil, E T; Beardsworth, A D and Wray, K (1986) Labour recruitment strategies and selection practices on construction sites. Construction Management and Economics, 4(1), pp. 37-55. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Discussions of the recruitment and employment of labour in the construction industry tend to be aggregate analyses, at the level of the firm or industry. The question as to what firms do when faced with a particular set of labour requirements at the operational level so far remains largely unanswered. This paper focuses upon the patterns of recruitment and selection adopted by main contractors on 43 medium to large construction sites. The balance of directly employed (newly recruited and transferred) and subcontracted labour is examined and variation noted by size and nature of work, firm size and location of work. Although variable, the restricted degree of direct employment is documented. The recruitment processes adopted on site are identified as relatively informal, adaptive and based upon short-term production needs. Selection processes emphasize criteria such as work history, experience, reliability and conformity, as opposed to formal qualifications. The paper suggests that while the recruitment and selection strategies adopted on sites are both instrumental and rational from the contractors viewpoint, they may have wider deleterious consequences. In particular the impact of such strategies on training provision, and on the development and maintenance of an adequately skilled workforce is raised.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | labour; recruitment; selection; site management |
| Index terms: | variation, history, strategy, construction site, site management, recruitment, labour requirement, construction industry, qualification, main contractor, aggregate, employment |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, educational resources, management, contractual condition, work location, architectural and construction history, construction operations, practitioner, materials science |
| Topics: | Human Resources, Site Management, Education, Contract Administration, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here