Abdel-Razek, R H and McCaffer, R (1987) A change in the UK construction industry structure: Implications for estimating. Construction Management and Economics, 5(3), pp. 227-242. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
The paper illustrates the extent to which use of sub-contractors has grown in recent years in the UK by reviewing the growth of small firms, who in the main act as sub-contractors. In five years, 1979 to 1984, the number of one-man firms has grown by 136%, and the value of work done by them has grown by 254%. Furthermore, all firms employing seven or less workers have grown by 94% in number and the value of their work has grown by 143%,. The value of work being undertaken by firms employing seven or less workers represents 24.7% of the total of private contractors' work undertaken in 1984 compared with 14.1% in 1979. The effects of this change on the estimator are described with particular reference to attendances, materials wastage and disruptions. The conclusion is that the estimators' task has been made more difficult by the changes in industry structure.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction industry structure; estimating; labour only sub-contractors; sub-contractors |
| Index terms: | construction industry, estimating, estimator, sub-contractor |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, profession, practitioner, financial and cost management |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here