Davis, C and Cochrane, S R (1987) Optimization of future manpower requirements in a multi-discipline consultancy. Construction Management and Economics, 5(1), pp. 45-56. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
This paper describes the role of matrix management in project-oriented multi-discipline consultants' organizations. The conjicting goals of project managers and functional departmental managers with regard to organization manpower levels are examined. A method, using a microcomputer spreadsheet, is developed to simulate the manpower requirements of multi-discipline organizations subject to a highly variable and uncertain project intake. A simplified model organization has been used to illustrate this procedure. A selection of construction projects, representing the anticipated future workload, with suitable durations and manpower requirements are input in an appropriate random manner into a special spreadsheet template to produce a representation of the variability of manpower requirements for the organization. The best combinations for each functional department, of permanent staff, overtime, and temporary staff at the peak manpower demands are studied. An optimization procedure is presented to minimize manpower costs and avoid over-staffing during trough periods of workload and alternatively under-stafing for peak requirements.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | manpower; multi-discipline organizations; optimization; projects; simulation |
| Index terms: | variability, project manager, workload, spreadsheet, duration, manager, construction project, consultancy |
| Subjects: | practitioner, production management, project controls, data science, profession, statistical analysis, management, organization |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Time Control, Project Management, Organizational Design, Human Resources |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here