Karni, R (1987) A systematic approach to stochastic scheduling. Construction Management and Economics, 5(3), pp. 187-198. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
A systematic methodology extends CPM project planning to allow for uncertainties, decision points, alternative courses of action, and likely changes and failures while executing the plan. Stochastic scheduling is carried out in eight steps. (1) The basic process and network are defined. (2) Uncertainty conditions are specified. (3) These conditions are formulated as a set of probability states, with corresponding durations and costs. (4) An augmented stochastic network is constructed. (5) From average values, durations and costs, a deterministic network is solved to provide an approximate picture of expected outcomes. (6) The stochastic network is solved, using a simulator; and the uncertainty effects of the stochastic conditions are analysed. (7) The effects of individual conditions on overall uncertainty are analysed. (8) An attempt is made to eliminate or modify those conditions contributing the most to uncertainty. The number of iterations needed to obtain a satisfactory simulation is also discussed. The stability of time and cost distributions is found to increase as the square root of the number of iterations.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | networks; probability; projects; scheduling; simulation; uncertainty |
| Index terms: | project planning, methodology, stability, scheduling, stochastic network, duration |
| Subjects: | project controls, networking, research methods, structural engineering, operations research, control systems |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here