Marshall, H E (1987) Building economics in the United States. Construction Management and Economics, 5(4), ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Building economics is described in the narrow context of methods of capital investment analysis applied to building investments in the United States. The common characteristic of all the methods described is that they consider benefits (savings) and costs over the project's life cycle or study period. Eight steps involved in making an economic evaluation are presented. The process is illustrated with a problem in choosing the economically efficient thermal resistance level of attic insulation. Appropriate applications are described for the following methods: life-cycle cost; net benefits; benefit-to-cost and savings-to-investment ratios; and internal rate of return. Federal and state agencies that use these methods are identified. The role of standards societies and professional organizations in epcouraging the use of these methods is described. Three projects in which these methods have been used are examined briefly in terms of methodology to illustrate the use of building economics methods. A description of difficulties in applying the methods concludes the paper.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | benefit-cost analysis; benefit-cost ratio; building economics; economic efficiency; economic evaluation; internal rate of return; life-cycle costing; net benefits; savings-to-investment ratio; standard economic methods |
| Index terms: | insulation, costing, economic evaluation, savings, life cycle, efficiency, building investment, thermal resistance, agency, building economics, methodology, capital investment, society, United States, cost analysis |
| Subjects: | performance management, accounting and finance, research methods, Geography, material properties and characteristics, asset management, sociology, financial analysis, cost management, communities and social development, value management, building materials, economic analysis, financial and cost management |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Quality Management, Site Management, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Construction Materials, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here