Walker, A and Hughes, W P (1987) A project managed by a multi-disciplinary practice: A systems-based case study. Construction Management and Economics, 5(2), pp. 123-140. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
The technique of linear responsibility analysis is used for a retrospective case study of a private industrial development consisting of an engineering factory and offices. A multi-disciplinary professional practice was used to manage and design the project. The organizational structure adopted on the project is analysed using concepts from systems theory which are included in Walker's theoretical model of the structure of building project organizations (Walker, 1981). This model proposes that the process of building provision can be viewed as systems and sub-systems which are differentiated from each other at decision points. Further to this, the subsystems can be viewed as the interaction of managing system and operating system. Using Walker's model, a systematic analysis of the relationships between the contributors gives a quantitative assessment of the efficacy of the organizational structure used. There was a high level of satisfaction with the completed project and this is reflected by the way in which the organization structure corresponded to the model's propositions. However, the project was subject to strong environmental forces which the project organization was not capable of entirely overcoming.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building; case study; linear responsibility analysis; private industry; project management; systems theory |
| Index terms: | satisfaction, case study, industrial development, project management, interaction, organizational structure, linear responsibility analysis, project organization, professional practice, systems theory |
| Subjects: | data analysis and analytics, project delivery, data collection methods, construction type, behavioral psychology, sociology, organizational theory, professional development, project management theory and practice, theoretical framing |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Project Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here