Aniekwu, A N and Okpala, D C (1988) Contractual arrangements and the performance of the Nigerian construction industry (the structural component). Construction Management and Economics, 6(1), pp. 3-11. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
The Nigerian construction industry is beset with many problems, such as uncompleted projects and poor quality work. Also the level of productivity is low, especially in projects handled by indigenous contractors. Investigation into the causes has identified two sets of variables, termed structural and systemic, as being responsible. Structural variables which are inherently related to the conditions and practices within a given environment, were found to be controllable, if special provisions can be made within the conditions of contract. The paper therefore examines these structural variables and relates them to provisions in the conditions of contract which undermine the performance of local contractors. It also suggests ways of improving the provisions to make them more effective.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | contractual arrangements; cost over-runs; delays; structural variables |
| Index terms: | local contractor, investigation, construction industry, productivity |
| Subjects: | management, industry analysis, data collection methods, practitioner |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here