Fazio, P; Théberge, P; revay, S and Moselhi, O (1988) Design impact of construction fast-track. Construction Management and Economics, 6(3), pp. 195-208. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Phased construction and fast-tracking have received considerable attention in recent years and have been synonymous with the development of new project delivery systems under the professional construction management approach. Many articles and even textbooks have described only the advantages of these popular methods. Despite the differences between the two approaches, outlined in this paper, they are still being referred to interchangeably by construction professionals. Through a case study, this paper also identifies the potential disadvantages of the fast-track technique. Problem areas associated with the implementation of this technique are identified and further ranked with respect to their frequency observed on 28 fast-track construction contracts. A delay analysis shows the impact of this accelerated technique on construction activities. The far-reaching effects of mistakes during the early design/engineering phase in a fast-track programme are usually underrated. Accelerating a project through fast-tracking is a major decision, and construction professionals are often not aware of its implications. Based on the case study examined in this paper and other fast-track constructions previously analysed, trouble areas requiring special attention have been depicted and recommendations with regard to the effective use of this technique are presented. It has also been shown that unless considerable attention is directed to problem areas, particularly those related to design, such a popular accelerated technique could result in unexpected delays.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | design management; fast-tracking; phased construction; professional construction management |
| Index terms: | programme, delay analysis, case study, project delivery, design management, implementation, construction contract, construction professional, fast-tracking, construction activity |
| Subjects: | contract type, construction operations, data collection methods, project controls, design process, professional development, project delivery, contractual arrangements |
| Topics: | Time Control, Information Management, Site Management, Procurement, Research Practice, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here