Local business cycle severity and induced labour mobility: The case of the construction workforce

Herzog, H W and Schlottmann, A M (1988) Local business cycle severity and induced labour mobility: The case of the construction workforce. Construction Management and Economics, 6(3), pp. 247-258. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine inter-state labour mobility within the construction industry, a sector of the local/national economy whose output (employment) is highly cyclically sensitive. Econometric estimates of the construction workforce migration decision indicate that such workers are responsive to economic conditions throughout local labour markets when considering geographic mobility. In this regard, workers respond to both static and dynamic measures of local well-being, and choose to move in the face of high local unemployement, slow growth, and high local cycle severity. In the latter respect, migration from metropolitan labour markets is significantly augmented (particularly among the unemployed) by the severity of local job loss attributable to national business cycle contractions, and stemmed somewhat by the rapidity of local job creation attributable to national expansions.The predominance of cycle-induced mobility within the construction workforce (vis-a-vis static local economic conditions) has important implications to both regional and national planners concerned with stabilization aspects of public facility siting (or closure). Thus, such worker responsiveness to local cycle severity should receive significant attention during impact assessment that precedes the construction (or closure) of large facilities such as military bases, public works and nuclear power plants.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: business cycles; dynamic conditions; impact assessment; logit estimates; migration
Index terms: migration, employment, mobility, economic condition, estimate, construction industry, stabilization, econometric, public work, labour market, planner, national economy, face, nuclear power, well-being, impact assessment
Subjects: energy systems, financial and cost management, economic analysis, psychology, value management, profession, mental health and wellbeing, industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, demography, infrastructure engineering, management, economics
Topics: Organizational Design, Human Resources, Supply Chain Management, Urban Studies, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Health and Safety
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here