Handa, V K and Abdalla, O (1989) Forecasting productivity by work sampling. Construction Management and Economics, 7(1), pp. 19-28. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
The measurement of labour inputs to the productivity process is the major subject of this study. It is concerned with the simplification of the operation of collecting labour productivity information on site where it is not a one-time task and should be a continuous effort to acquire as many measurements as possible to ensure constant field management control of the project. The study employs the simple methods of work sampling and learning curves for field managément control to measure labour utilization during the construction process. Work sampling technique is a simple and easy technique to use in the management of site resources, time and labour, but it is only an indirect measurement of actual productivity. Therefore, the study has concentrated on demonstrating the correlation between the work sampling percentages, unit rate productivities, and the learning rates of global activities through the development of productivity projection models. Thus, it is possible to quantify productivity and learning rates directly through the simple technique of work sampling.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction sites; learning curves; management; productivity; regression analysis; unit rates; work sampling |
| Index terms: | construction process, unit rate, construction site, labour utilization, simplification, regression analysis, sampling, labour productivity, productivity, forecasting |
| Subjects: | building construction, statistical analysis, management, work location, financial and cost management, prediction and forecasting, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Human Resources, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here