An ergonomic analysis framework for construction tasks

Russell, J S and Skibniewski, M J (1990) An ergonomic analysis framework for construction tasks. Construction Management and Economics, 8(3), pp. 329-338. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

This paper presents a new methodology for obtaining a quantitative measure of human task performance complexity and effort on the construction site. An example application of the developed methodology to the analysis of concrete placement tasks is provided. The developed method can be used to aid construction equipment manufacturers in understanding and assessing the automation potential for a variety of construction work tasks.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction automation; human performance; robotics potential of construction tasks
Index terms: construction site, placement, manufacturer, complexity, methodology, construction equipment, automation, robotics, construction work, human-performance
Subjects: practitioner, human factors and perception, work location, operations management, management, research methods, automation and robotics, construction equipment, systems engineering
Topics: Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management, Roles and Professions, Plant and Equipment, Digital Applications, Human Resources, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here