Tiong, R L K (1990) BOT projects: Risks and securities. Construction Management and Economics, 8(3), pp. 315-328. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
There has been a growing trend in recent years for governments in many developing countries to place major public investments, particularly for infrastructure projects, into the private sector. This has meant that governments look to the private sector to finance projects using the projects' anticipated revenues as security rather than relying upon a direct sovereign guarantee of the project debt. Many have adopted the 'Build-Operate-Transfer', or BOT approach, so that the private sector have to operate the plant and transfer the ownership to the government after a specified concession period. However, for BOT to succeed in any major privatized project, the host government cannot withdraw or adpot a passive role: it has to ensure the right political and commercial environments in which to advance the projects. This paper deals with the various guarantees and incentives that could be provided by the government. It covers the responsibilities and undertakings that the project sponsors could commit to in order to negotiate favourable concessions from the government and to raise financing that is so vital for the BOT model to be successful. The financing, political and technical risks are discussed and the techniques that could be used to have these risks covered are suggested to ensure a smooth project implementation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | concession; financing; guarantee; risk; security; toll |
| Index terms: | revenue, toll, project sponsor, developing country, guarantee, financing, private sector, concession period, implementation, infrastructure project, build-operate-transfer, ownership |
| Subjects: | contractual arrangements, economic analysis, sociology, infrastructure and transport systems, industry analysis, transportation engineering, contract structure, economics, development economics |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, International Construction, Stakeholder Management, Procurement, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here