Project risk action management

Berkeley, D; Humphreys, P C and Thomas, R D (1991) Project risk action management. Construction Management and Economics, 9(1), pp. 3-17. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

This paper examines the requirements for project risk action management techniques which can assist clients and project managers to assess and pre-empt potential sources of risk. These sources may be external or internal to the project and include those which may result from the manager s own actions. The aim is to encourage project managers to be sensitive to these potential sources of risk, to be able to anticipate their occurrence, to appreciate their potential impacts on the project objectives and to reduce their future impact through appropriate risk action management strategies. The paper examines project management goals and objectives and discusses risks which may arise to threaten the achievement of these objectives. The conventional risk analysis approach is reviewed in the context of the need to identify and assess such risks and their potential effects. The paper reviews the direct relationship, as presented in the conventional approaches to risk analysis, between 'risk drivers' and risked consequences, and demonstrates that this represents a primarily passive approach to project risk management. It argues that, if the manager is able to anticipate risks, he should also be able to take appropriate pre-emptive actions before they occur. Thus, we show how risk action management techniques, within the context of project management, can support project managers in the formulation of project strategies, planning and the achievement of project objectives.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: project management goals; project risk areas; project risk profile; risk action management; risk action review; risk analysis; risk drivers; risk factors; risk management responsibilities
Index terms: project management, risk factor, risk management, project risk management, management strategy, project manager, risk analysis, project strategy, manager
Subjects: profession, risk assessment, practitioner, strategic project management, management, project management theory and practice, financial risk, environmental hazards
Topics: Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Project Management, Business Strategy, Cost Management
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here