Escalation management: Forecasting the effects of inflation on building projects

Fellows, R F (1991) Escalation management: Forecasting the effects of inflation on building projects. Construction Management and Economics, 9(2), pp. 187-204. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Following a review of the development and use of indices which purport to measure the effects of inflation upon the building industry, the paper focuses upon the problem of forecasting. Errors in published forecasts of building cost indices and tender price indices are noted and various possibilities for achieving more accurate forecasts are evaluated. The evaluations demonstrate that stochastic time series forecasting is a useful approach. A probabilistic project cash flow model for NED02 work categories was produced and combined with stochastic time series forecasts of the NEDO category indices to yield project escalation forecasts of measured variability. Although high forecasts of escalation resulted, these forecasts were of lower error than other forecasts derived from published information. Sensitivity analyses were used to consider variability and error sources in the forecasts, showing the primary variable to be the indices. It is concluded that forecasts of projects' escalation based upon stochastic time series techniques offer considerable advantages to the construction industry and its clients.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: cash flow; escalation; inflation; stochastic time series forecasting indices
Index terms: forecasting, variability, construction industry, building industry, tender price, sensitivity analysis, time series, cash flow, inflation
Subjects: economic analysis, prediction and forecasting, data science, tendering, financial management, statistical analysis, environmental hazards, industry analysis
Topics: Procurement, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here