Al-Tabtabai, H (1992) Judgemental forecasting in construction projects. Construction Management and Economics, 10(1), pp. 19-30. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Forecasting is a very important strategic task within the project controlframework. Forecast activity seeks to answer one of project management’s prime questions: 'When will the the project be completed and what will it cost?' Large variances in costs or schedules will impact the profitability, cashjow and, in extreme cases, the viability of projects. This paper discusses a new approach toforecasting within the context of project control. The paper concerns itself with the situation wherein a project manager has observed a variancefrom a project goal (a wage rate, for example) and the manager must now predict (i.e. forecast) thejinal actual wage rate for the project. Forecasting is a dificult task because one must understand the effect ofpast performance and the impact of future events. A goodforecasting technique, therefore, needs to include both historical trend-based data and competent judgements based on construction experience and knowledge. This research was conducted to develop an alternative approach to forecasting which would use both historical data and human judgement in a formal forecasting model. This paper describes the adaptation of Social Judgement Theory to forecasting for construction project control.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cost control; forecasting; project control; project management; social judgement theory |
| Index terms: | cost control, construction project, manager, profitability, project control, project management, project manager, forecasting, variance, adaptation |
| Subjects: | production management, project management theory and practice, measurement and scaling, control systems, practitioner, profession, user focus, financial and cost management, economic analysis, prediction and forecasting |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Project Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here