Läufer, A; Howell, G A and Rosenfeld, Y (1992) Three modes of short-term construction planning. Construction Management and Economics, 10(3), pp. 249-262. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Short-term construction planning requires more than simple interpretation of the project schedule; it rests on the organization’s ability to collect information, identify and solve problems, and implement change. Each of three different modes of short-term planning - foreman planning, supervisor quality circles, and operations/systems analysis - makes a unique contribution to detailed short-term planning. The need for effective short-term planning is great, since numerous factors exist which can be identified only after construction begins. These uncertainties mean that detailed work plans for individual crews can be completed only near the start of a specific job, and can cover only a limited period of time. Each of the three separate planning modes involves different functions, different sources of data and different problem-solving techniques – hence, three unique planning products. Using these modes in combination takes advantage of their powerful cumulative effect, assures short-term project objectives, and also supports the continuous learning required for middle- and long-term organizational improvements. Applying all three allows project administrative and organizational forces to reinforce each other, providing a synergistic effect. Construction sites need all three modes to achieve control, promote innovation, and assure high performance at all levels of the organization.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction control; construction methods; planning; project management; quality circles; supervision; systems analysis |
| Index terms: | project management, systems analysis, construction planning, construction method, supervisor, quality circle, construction site, supervision |
| Subjects: | construction planning, analytical methods, building construction, project management theory and practice, performance measurement, work location, practitioner, control systems |
| Topics: | Site Management, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here