Near optimal solution for resource-constrained scheduling problems

Moselhi, O and Lorterapong, P (1993) Near optimal solution for resource-constrained scheduling problems. Construction Management and Economics, 11(4), pp. 293-303. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

This paper presents an efficient resource allocation algorithm, and examines its performance against a number of scheduling heuristic rules, aimed at minimizing project durations in a multiple resource-constrained environment. The algorithm has been coded in BASIC and can easily interface with available planning and scheduling software systems. Unlike other heuristic network-based algorithms, resources are allocated simultaneously to sets of activities, rather than to individual activities in a sequential manner. An experiment was conducted to study the performance of the proposed algorithm and compare its results with those generated by four different heuristic scheduling rules, including those found to have the most superior performance such as the widely used least total float rule. Thirty-one network examples adopted from the literature are analysed. The results indicate that the proposed algorithm is superior to the others. The proposed algorithm provides a reasonable trade-off between the best accuracy associated with optimization techniques and the ease of computational effort associated with the simple least total float model. As such, it maximizes the benefits of the two limiting approaches.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: heuristic scheduling; project management; resource allocation; resource-constrained scheduling
Index terms: scheduling, accuracy, experiment, optimization technique, resource allocation, heuristic, duration, project management
Subjects: risk assessment, data collection methods, resource management, operations research, project management theory and practice, professional development, algorithms, project controls
Topics: Digital Applications, Time Control, Site Management, Information Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Risk Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here