A survey of construction site safety in Honduras

Jaselskis, E J and Suazo, G A R (1994) A survey of construction site safety in Honduras. Construction Management and Economics, 12(3), pp. 245-255. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

This paper provides the results of a construction site safety survey conducted in Honduras. A questionnaire was used to collect safety-related information from construction workers, field management and upper management in the Home Office on residential, commercial and heavy civil construction projects in San Pedro Sula, Honduras. Data were collected using face-to-face interviews - 108 construction workers, 10 field managers and eight senior managers participated. Data were analysed using correlation, regression and analysis of variance techniques. Results demonstrated a substantial lack of awareness or importance for safety at all levels of the construction organization. Workers rarely wore personal protective equipment, used poorly constructed scaffolds, improperly used tools and ladders and disregarded good housekeeping practices. Almost three- quarters of the craftsmen suffered at least one lost-time accident; many of their injuries were in expected locations on their bodies given the nature of their work and the site conditions. Many of the field project managers stated that they did not provide workers with personal protective equipment or safety training and did not use a dedicated safety person on-site. Top level management does not appear convinced that it is in their best interests to improve safety performance either since only approximately 25% provided a company-wide safety training programme, maintained accident records and provided safety incentives. Additional results, recommendations for improving construction safety in Honduras, study limitations and future research areas are also identified.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: accident profiles; developing countries; Honduras; safety
Index terms: construction worker, craft worker, safety training, personal protective equipment, construction organization, variance, project manager, construction safety, safety performance, construction project, questionnaire, construction site, face, Honduras, programme, survey, developing country, interview, manager, injury
Subjects: organization, profession, data collection methods, practitioner, work location, psychology, development economics, Geography, production management, measurement and scaling, health conditions and diseases, occupational health and safety management, project controls, environmental health
Topics: Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, International Construction, Time Control, Site Management, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here