Agapiou, A; Price, A and McCaffer, R (1995) Forecasting the supply of construction skills in the UK. Construction Management and Economics, 13(4), pp. 353-364. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
An aggregate supply model is presented for craft trainee entrants to the UK construction sector using annual data for the period 1976-1990. The theoretical framework used to formulate the equation was based on the human capital approach to analysing labour supply, as applied to new entrants to the engineering sector. In particular, the paper tests the hypothesis that the proportion of school-leavers choosing to train as construction operatives depends on the real craft wage and the long-term prospects of the construction industry. Co-integration was used to produce a long-run relationship between intakes, real wages, output and other variables. The supply equation was then reduced to a more parsimonious representation. The final restricted form of the model was tested against various diagnostic statistical criteria. The real craft wage and output were found to be the main factors determining the choice between training as a construction craft operative and any other job. In addition, demographic trends and socioenvironmental factors such as the image of the industry were found to have a strong effect on the supply of new entrants.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | forecasting; models; skills; supply |
| Index terms: | construction sector, integration, wages, operative, construction operative, construction industry, aggregate, labour supply, forecasting, human capital |
| Subjects: | practitioner, materials science, prediction and forecasting, labour economics, economics, industry analysis, business economics, organizational analysis |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Human Resources, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here