Alkass, S; Tribaldos, E; Mazerolle, M and Harris, F (1995) Computer aided construction delay analysis and claims preparation. Construction Management and Economics, 13(4), pp. 335-352. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Delays are the most common and costly problem encountered on construction projects. Analysing construction delays has become an integral part of the project’s construction life. To prepare for litigation, schedule documentation proving responsibility must be prepared. With present methods of tracking projects, the preparation of such schedules can be time consuming and costly. The analysis itself is usually complex and can be aided by a computerized approach. This paper describes the introduction of a computer system for delays claim analysis called computerized delay claims analysis (CDCA). The system utilizes the isolated delay type (IDT) technique. Part of this system can use existing software such as project management, cost control, database management and spreadsheets. In addition to these, an expert system tailored to the specific expertise of construction claims has been used to facilitate the decision making process. CDCA is tested against a real case study of a building project to demonstrate its effectiveness in determining the responsibility of contracting parties with respect to the project’s delays. The system is expected to assist in improving the process of delays analysis, thus reducing the cost of claims preparation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | claims; computing; delays; expert systems; planning; project control |
| Index terms: | expert system, computing, construction delay, cost control, construction project, construction claim, computer system, documentation, effectiveness, project control, project management, case study, spreadsheet, contracting party, litigation, database, decision-making process |
| Subjects: | financial and cost management, data science, data collection methods, control systems, dispute resolution, practitioner, computing systems, decision analysis, data management, project controls, payment, performance management, project management theory and practice, professional development, production management |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Legal Issues, Digital Applications, Contract Administration, Time Control, Research Practice, Project Management, Information Management, Cost Management, Risk Management, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here