Modelling of on-site work cells for the simulation of automated and semi-automated construction

Ibañez-Guzmán, J (1995) Modelling of on-site work cells for the simulation of automated and semi-automated construction. Construction Management and Economics, 13(5), pp. 427-434. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

This paper describes a software-based approach for the design, modelling and simulation of automated and semi-automated construction. It proposes that, through the use of currently available software, it is possible to attain the project definition phase for new robotic devices without the need for fabricating prototypes. The use of two different models for the simulation of on-site work cells is proposed. The first looks into the physical operations of new construction robots. The second examines the influence that the automation of the target operations in the construction process could have. The paper includes a description of the logical process and sample software tools plus applications that can be used towards the development of a computer-aided design construction automation environment. Emphasis is put on the use of kinematic and discrete-event simulation techniques. A comparison of this approach with full prototyping undertake by certain large contractors is presented.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction robots; design; discrete-event simulation; kinematic simulation
Index terms: computer aided design, automated construction, prototype, modelling, automation, construction process, site work, prototyping
Subjects: building construction, automation and robotics, computational design, site logistics, modelling and simulation, analytical methods, innovation and technology management
Topics: Site Management, Digital Applications, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here