Risk analysis in construction: A paradigm shift from a hard to soft approach

Mak, S W (1995) Risk analysis in construction: A paradigm shift from a hard to soft approach. Construction Management and Economics, 13(5), pp. 385-392. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Risk analysis in construction is becoming more popular as competition, project size and complexity increase. Traditional risk analysis relies on rules of thumb. While this approach can work, it is neither robust nor reliable. The development of information technology has made the use of probabilistic estimating and simulation a practicable alternative. These techniques are, however, precise but not necessarily accurate as simplification and many assumptions are used. Further information technology development in expert systems and the paradigm shift in systems engineering from a hard to soft approach has promoted an alternative approach to risk analysis utilizing the theory of fuzzy sets which translates linguistic expressions (such as highly likely) into numerical membership functions. This paper introduces risk analysis in construction against characteristics of the industry. It is argued that normative theories in probability are not as applicable in the construction industry as first perceived. The concept of fuzzy sets is described and the difference in approach in modelling risk between probabilistic and fuzzy methods will be presented. Initial empirical study reveals the applicability of fuzzy sets theory in risk analysis. This is important in that a model of risk analysis can be developed requiring the user to express risk attitude linguistically. Moreover, the results are also in linguistic terms and can, therefore, be understood and interpreted correctly by the user.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: expert systems; fuzzy sets theory; information technology; probability; risk
Index terms: risk attitude, expert system, competition, fuzzy method, risk analysis, information technology, complexity, estimating, becoming, systems engineering, fuzzy set, paradigm, empirical study, modelling, construction industry, simplification
Subjects: analytical methods, financial and cost management, data analysis and analytics, computing systems, systems engineering, environmental hazards, industry analysis, decision-making and optimization, philosophical process, market analysis, data management, research methods, decision-making and reasoning, education and knowledge transfer, management
Topics: Digital Applications, Sustainability, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here