Resource-based model for automatic cash-flow forecasting

Navon, R (1995) Resource-based model for automatic cash-flow forecasting. Construction Management and Economics, 13(6), pp. 501-510. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

The paper discusses different approaches to, and models for, project level cash flow forecasting. The importance of cash flow management, both at the project and at the company level is also discussed. The paper presents a resource-based computerized cash-flow forecasting model. The main issue addressed by that model is the solution of the compatibility problem caused by the different data structures of the cost and the schedule items. The cost items are normally specified in terms of the project's physical elements (e.g. slab, beam, column, etc.), while the schedule is expressed in terms of activities (e.g. formwork erection, rebar erection, rebar placement, concrete pouring, etc.). The proposition is the automatic integration of the bill of quantities, the estimate and the schedule databases, using a non-project-specific database, which is a dynamic component of the model. The integration algorithms are presented. Additional issues addressed by the model are time lag and billing period adjustments, material supply policies, anticipated real number of working days per month, subcontractors' payments, overhead expenses and income flow forecasting.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: cash flow; construction management; forecasting; resource-based; computer
Index terms: income, cash flow management, cash flow forecasting, rebar, database, beam, column, data structure, placement, subcontractor, cash flow, formwork, bills of quantities, integration, estimate, forecasting
Subjects: practitioner, economic analysis, structural engineering, prediction and forecasting, building materials, data science, financial management, building construction, organizational analysis, management, data management, financial and cost management
Topics: Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Human Resources, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Construction Materials, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here