Construction delay analysis techniques

Alkass, S; Mazerolle, M and Harris, F (1996) Construction delay analysis techniques. Construction Management and Economics, 14(5), pp. 375-394. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Construction projects continue to suffer delays. Things go wrong and the project's completion date gets pushed back, with someone to be blamed for it. In practice, attempts are made to identify the causes of delays and schedules are modified to incorporate revised duration and new project time. The analysis itself is usually complex and can be aided by a computerized approach. This paper discusses different delay analysis techniques that are currently used by practitioners in the construction industry. It also discusses a proposed new delay analysis technique called the Isolated Delay Type (IDT). These techniques were tested against a case example and their strengths and weaknesses highlighted. The new technique can be used as a stand-alone module for delay analysis or could be incorporated within a computer system for construction delay analysis and claims preparation called Computerized Delay Claims Analysis (CDCA) that integrates different software including an expert system and management software such as scheduling and a database or spread-sheet.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: claims; computing; construction delays; construction management; construction planning; expert systems; project control; scheduling
Index terms: database, causes of delay, module, duration, construction industry, project control, construction planning, computer system, scheduling, construction project, construction delay, delay analysis, practitioner, computing, expert system
Subjects: architectural elements, production management, project controls, data management, industry analysis, control systems, computing systems, practitioner, operations research, construction planning
Topics: Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Project Management, Time Control, Site Management, Digital Applications, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here