The impact of public construction investment upon special economic zones: the Chinese experience

Chen, J J (1996) The impact of public construction investment upon special economic zones: the Chinese experience. Construction Management and Economics, 14(2), pp. 175-182. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Since embarking on economic reforms and the open door policy in 1979, China has been achieving rapid economic growth and development. The Chinese government has made substantial construction investment, especially in establishing the Special Economic Zones (SEZs) as test beds for development policies and homes for foreign investors. From the viewpoint of China, most of these investments are regarded as public investment. It is, therefore, of interest to examine the extent to which the investment benefits society. This paper analyses this type of investment by using a cost-benefit technique to build up a social cost-benefit model. The results indicate that the Chinese public construction investment, particularly in the case of the SEZs, is a beneficial investment from the standpoint of China's economic welfare. Although considerable public expenditure has been incurred in establishing the areas, the benefits, such as employment, foreign-exchange earnings and technical training, which the development has brought to China, have exceeded the costs. The infrastructure will remain and will benefit China in the long term. This is the main reason for the government to extend this type of development to the whole country.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: China; construction investment; fdi; sez; social cost-benefit analysis
Index terms: China, society, public construction, economic growth, investor, public expenditure, employment
Subjects: Geography, management, economic development, political science, communities and social development, building construction, sociology
Topics: Governance, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Human Resources
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here