Construction as a manufacturing process? Similarities and differences between industrialized housing and car production in Japan

Gann, D M (1996) Construction as a manufacturing process? Similarities and differences between industrialized housing and car production in Japan. Construction Management and Economics, 14(5), pp. 437-450. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

In Japan, similar management practices in product development, design, supply-chain coordination, marketing and sales have been used to produce very different products: industrialized housing and automobiles. Manufacturing principles derived from the car industry have been successfully used to produce attractive, customized and affordable homes. But there are limits to which such techniques can be applied to manage the assembly of wide varieties of component parts needed to produce complex customized products. Managers must trade off the need to achieve economies of scale in the production of standardized factory parts with economies of scope in various stages of assembly in order to provide flexibility to satisfy consumer choices. The housing industries can benefit by learning more about the use of advanced manufacturing techniques developed in car production. At the same time, automobile makers may learn more about the management of customization from the way in which housing firms organize sales, design and final assembly. The paper suggests that wider ranges of choice can be delivered through managing the whole production system, balancing the use of standard components with flexibility in assembly, rather than by solely attempting to optimize control in discrete parts of the system.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: car production; economies of scale; innovation; Japanese industrialized housing; manufacturing processes; technological learning
Index terms: housing, product development, management practice, Japan, production system, manager, coordination, consumer choice, marketing, manufacturing process, customization
Subjects: practitioner, innovation studies, consumer economics, business, construction type, construction manufacturing, Geography, management, manufacturing engineering
Topics: Organizational Design, Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here