Gann, D M and Barlow, J (1996) Flexibility in building use: The technical feasibility of converting redundant offices into flats. Construction Management and Economics, 14(1), pp. 55-66. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
The potential for converting empty offices into housing depends upon demands for converted space, the ability to finance conversions and attitudes of owners of empty buildings, together with flexibility in planning and ability to overcome technical constraints. This article explains the reasons for the large stock of redundant office buildings in the UK and questions whether some of these can be converted to provide much needed affordable housing. Technical constraints on their own are rarely insurmountable but the cost of making necessary changes may often be higher than other options of demolition and new building. Case studies of converted buildings show that it is necessary for project managers to deal with a range of issues from planning, location and finance to the accurate assessment of technical criteria in order for successful outcomes. It has often been difficult to find sites where all the necessary variables coincide in a positive manner and for this reason, the conversion of offices into flats has limited potential. It cannot therefore be seen as a panacea for housing shortages or for the reuse of redundant office buildings. Lessons from the experience of the UK property and construction industries illustrate the need to incorporate greater flexibility to meet unforeseen changes in use in the future.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | change of use; conversion; flexibility; offices into flats; technical feasibility |
| Index terms: | office building, owner, case study, project manager, conversion, option, construction industry, affordable housing, housing, shortages, change of use |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, construction type, profession, legal frameworks and systems, economic analysis, manufacturing engineering, industry analysis, sociology, decision analysis |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Construction Technology, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here