Hua, G B (1996) Residential construction demand forecasting using economic indicators: A comparative study of artificial neural networks and multiple regression. Construction Management and Economics, 14(1), pp. 25-34. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
In recent years, demand for residential construction has been growing rapidly in Singapore. This paper proposes the use of economic indicators to predict demand for residential construction in Singapore. At the same time, two forecasting techniques are applied, namely, Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Multiple Regression (MR), the former being a state-of-the-art technique while the latter a conventional one. A comparative study is carried out to determine whether the use of economic indicators with the application of the ANN technique can produce better predictions than with the MR method. A total of 12 economic indicators are identified as significantly related to demand for residential construction. Quarterly data from these 12 indicators are used to develop the ANN model. In order to assess the forecasting performance of this state-of-the-art technique, the same set of data is used to develop a conventional MR model. A comparison is made between the two models, in terms of their forecasting accuracy, by using a relative measure known as the Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE). The forecasting error of the ANN model is found to be about one fifth of that derived from the MR model. The low MAPE values (less than 10%) obtained for both models also indicate that economic indicators may be used as reliable inputs for the modelling of residential construction demand in Singapore.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | artificial neural networks; demand; economic indicators; forecasting; multiple regression |
| Index terms: | accuracy, artificial neural network, Singapore, economic indicator, state of the art, comparative study, residential construction, forecasting, multiple-regression, modelling |
| Subjects: | research dissemination and communication, Geography, statistical analysis, research design and methodology, data analysis and analytics, analytical methods, prediction and forecasting, construction integration, modelling and simulation, professional development |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Information Management, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here