Lambropoulos, S; Manolopoulos, N and Pantouvakis, J P (1996) Semantic: Smart earthmoving analysis and estimation of cost. Construction Management and Economics, 14(2), pp. 79-92. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Earthmoving is an important activity in almost all civil engineering projects; consequently there is always the need to improve existing earthmoving operational and managerial techniques. This paper presents an integrated computer aided system for the analysis and cost estimation of various earthmoving tasks. The fully operational SEMANTIC consists of four modules. The smart module, exploiting artificial intelligence techniques, advises the user on the selection of the appropriate type of machinery for the task in question. The data management module takes advantage of extended databases containing information on types of soil and technical and cost parameters for a large number of equipment models. Based on descriptive information provided by the user, it suggests values for the many parameters required and facilitates enormously the preparation of input for analytical computations. The output and cost estimation module comprises algorithms for various earthmoving tasks and related machine types or combinations. Finally, the sensitivity analysis module provides the user with information on the magnitude of possible errors due to bad estimating of the input parameters; this module was also used to provide a comparison of the SEMANTIC output to the Caterpillar Manual output.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | civil engineering; earthworks; estimating; expert systems |
| Index terms: | module, estimating, computation, artificial intelligence, earthmoving, cost estimating, expert system, database, earthwork, estimation, data management, sensitivity analysis |
| Subjects: | financial and cost management, computational methods, data management, environmental hazards, construction operations, architectural elements, artificial intelligence, construction methods |
| Topics: | Site Management, Design Practice, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Digital Applications, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here