The effectiveness of formal quality management systems in achieving the required cover in reinforced concrete

Shammas-Toma, M; Seymour, D E and Clark, L (1996) The effectiveness of formal quality management systems in achieving the required cover in reinforced concrete. Construction Management and Economics, 14(4), pp. 353-364. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Much attention has been given to ways of controlling quality through formalized management systems. A study has recently been completed at the University of Birmingham, funded by the Building Research Establishment, designed to establish the extent to which construction specifications are being achieved in reinforced concrete structures and correlations between the quality levels achieved and the site organization structure, and control procedures and supervisory and workmanship practices. The findings suggest that the existence of formal quality control systems do not have the intended, positive impact on quality. The implications of this are discussed in terms of the need to recognize the limitations of trying to remedy sporadic defects through checking and to institute procedures aimed at eliminating systemic or chronic defects. Such a strategy would involve developing greater coordination between participants and enabling a properly trained work-force to do the work 'right first time'. It is recognized that for this strategy to be realized, considerable changes in attitude, culture and procurement arrangements would be necessary.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction defects; operatives; quality systems
Index terms: strategy, control procedure, construction defect, coordination, site organization, management system, specification, operative, quality management system, Birmingham, reinforced concrete, quality control, building research, effectiveness, workmanship
Subjects: performance management, practitioner, project delivery, contractual condition, building materials, Geography, contract obligations, management, research management
Topics: Legal Issues, Construction Materials, Organizational Design, Project Management, Quality Management, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Roles and Professions, Contract Administration, Site Management, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here