Ahmad, I U and Sein, M K (1997) Construction project teams for TQM: A factor-element impact model. Construction Management and Economics, 15(5), pp. 457-467. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
The factor-element impact model is a normative, theory-based contingency model. It is concerned with identifying the factors that affect the success of total quality management (TQM) initiatives in construction projects. This model is based upon organizational theory, utilizing an interactionist view of organizational design. If TQM is to succeed, construction project teams should be formed with its implementation in mind. The most important factors influencing the success of particular project team configurations are project characteristics. Organizational characteristics of participating firms are also significant. The contingency model developed in this paper involves an iterative approach of designing construction project teams to minimize negative effects on TQM. Guidelines are offered on how to apply the model, and two scenarios are presented to illustrate its application.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | normative models; organization theory; project team; total quality management |
| Index terms: | total quality management, organizational theory, construction project, configuration, construction project team, organizational design, implementation, project team, organizational characteristic |
| Subjects: | evaluation methods, project delivery, contractual arrangements, business, systems engineering, sociology, production management |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Quality Management, Procurement, Project Management, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here